MPAA Says: Don't Like Global Fascism? Go Fuck Yourself!

Yup! That's right folks: If you think the idea of world government sucks ass and that people should at least have a say in deciding what laws we should impose upon ourselves, well... Go Fuck Yourself! You Hate Hollywood!!! And ya know what else, You're an ungreatful, unpatriotic communist bed wetter who support international terrorism!!! You Bastards!!!! Argh!!!

And so there it is. I hate Hollywood! Forget about the so called great propaganda they produce there for just a moment... I don't hate Detroit simply because some really crappy cars are made there year after year after year. I might hate the fucknuts at Ford or Chevy or whatever, but surely not Detroit!!! Rock City? No fuckin' way man! Hollywood? Give me a fuckin' break. Fuck Hollywood. Nothin' there but a bunch of smack shootin' crack tootin' baby rapin' video tapin' ass whores lookin for no good, if you ask me... Fuck em!!! The whole three lots left of em...

That's my response to this article: MPAA Says Copyright-Treaty Critics Hate Hollywood Threat Level Wired.com

There's got to be a better way of protecting intellectual property rights!!! And I think I've got the answer, start thinking for yourself and tell thsse fucking idiots to go fuck themselves in the ass three times daily... Turn off your TV!!! for god's sakes!!! Pretty soon, they'll think they have the intellectual rights to the whole of the English language or Spanish or perhaps French. Fuck it, The MPAA has dibs on every form of communication that could possibly take place between human beings, between mamal and foul, between fish and bait. Go fucking figure!!!

But I oh how I do love copyleft, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and all the other blessed bands muckraking the fuck out of this shit. Without them, we might sereously never know anything about anything ever again. On account of, We The Peoople don't seem to matter anymore... We are the enemy!!! Well I say, fuck that!

Public Knowledge, a “copyleft” lobbying group who has seen the unfinished
treaty’s text, blasted Glickman’s comment, which comes weeks after the MPAA
urged the Federal Communications Commission to support internet
filtering of unauthorized copyrighted material.

“We do want to make certain that the rights of internet users are not
trampled by overwhelming government power asserted at the behest of a single special interest,” Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge’s president, said in a statement. She added that it is “inappropriate to ask ISPs and application designers to do what the studios themselves have found impossible to do: manage security to prevent all illegal copying.”

Along with Public Knowledge, the movie studios, internet providers, electronics companies and lawyers for the recording industry have been given access to the text of the treaty that has not finalized. We’ve asked many of them to provide details, but confidentiality agreements with the Obama administration forbid that.

While Glickman would do well by apologizing for his George W.
Bush-style “With us or against us” smearing of his debate opponents, we applaud his call to unwind the secrecy surrounding the accord.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT: www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/11/mpaa-acta-letter/

ATM Vendor Halts Researcher’s Talk on Vulnerability

By Kim Zetter June 30, 2009 , Wired Magazine

An ATM vendor has succeeded in getting a security talk pulled from the upcoming Black Hat conference after a researcher announced he would demonstrate a vulnerability in the system.

Barnaby Jack, a researcher with Juniper Networks, was to present a demonstration showing how he could “jackpot” a popular ATM brand by exploiting a vulnerability in its software.

Jack was scheduled to present his talk at the upcoming Black Hat security conference being held in Las Vegas at the end of July. But on Monday evening, his employer released a statement saying it was canceling the talk due to the vendor’s intervention.

“Juniper believes that Jack’s research is important to be presented in a public forum in order to advance the state of security,” the statement read. “However, the affected ATM vendor has expressed to us concern about publicly disclosing the research findings before its constituents were fully protected. Considering the scope and possible exposure of this issue on other vendors, Juniper decided to postpone Jack’s presentation until all affected vendors have sufficiently addressed the issues found in his research.”

In the description of his talk on the conference web site, Jack wrote that, “The most prevalent attacks on Automated Teller Machines typically involve the use of card skimmers, or the physical theft of the machines themselves. Rarely do we see any targeted attacks on the underlying software. This presentation will retrace the steps I took to interface with, analyze, and find a vulnerability in a line of popular new model ATM’s. The presentation will explore both local and remote attack vectors, and finish with a live demonstration of an attack on an unmodified, stock ATM.”

Jack did not disclose the ATM brand or discuss whether the vulnerability was found in the ATM’s own software or in its underlying operating system. Diebold ATMs, one of the most popular brands, runs on a Windows operating system, as do some other brands of ATMs.

Diebold did not respond to a call for comment.

Earlier this year, Diebold released an urgent alert (.pdf) announcing that Russian hackers had installed malicious software on several of its Opteva model ATMs in Russia and Ukraine. A security researcher at SophosLabs uncovered three examples of Trojan horse programs designed to infect the ATMs and wrote a brief analysis of them. Last month another security research lab, Trustwave’s SpiderLabs, provided more in-depth analysis of malware used to attack 20 ATMs in Russia and Ukraine of various brands.

According to SpiderLabs, the attack required an insider, such as an ATM technician or anyone else with a key to the machine, to place the malware on the ATM. Once that was done, attackers could insert a control card into the machine’s card reader to trigger the malware and give them control of the machine through a custom interface and the ATM’s keypad.

The malware captured account numbers and PINs from the machine’s transaction application and then delivered it to the thief on a receipt printed from the machine in an encrypted format or to a storage device inserted in the card reader. A thief could also instruct the machine to eject whatever cash is inside the machine. A fully loaded ATM can hold up to $600,000.

It’s unclear if the talk Jack was scheduled to give addresses the same vulnerability and malware or a new kind of attack.

It’s not the first time that a vendor has intervened to halt a security talk discussing a vulnerability with its system. In 2005, Cisco tried to prevent researcher Mike Lynn from presenting his talk on a serious security hole in the operating system that runs its routers.

Lynn had received approval from both Cisco and his employer Internet Security Systems (ISS) to present the talk at Black Hat that year. But Cisco changed its mind at the last minute, pressuring the conference to cancel the talk and rip out pages of the presentation from the conference catalogue. Cisco and ISS threatened to sue Lynn and conference organizers if the talk proceeded. Lynn resigned from his job hours before the scheduled talk and gave his demonstration anyway. He was roundly praised by security professionals, including administrators of military and government networks, for defying the threats and disclosing the important vulnerability.

At the end of his talk, Lynn asked the audience if anyone wanted to give him a job. Juniper Networks, the company now responsible for pulling the Barnaby Jack talk, hired Lynn shortly thereafter.